Defamation against the Irish Examiner by planning executive resolved

Orla Purcell, the former executive director of the representative body, had claimed she was defamed by two articles published by the newspaper in January 2023, written by senior reporter Mick Clifford.
Defamation against the Irish Examiner by planning executive resolved

High Court Reporters

A former Irish Planning Institute (IPI) executive has settled her High Court defamation action against the Irish Examiner.

Orla Purcell, the former executive director of the representative body, had claimed she was defamed by two articles published by the newspaper in January 2023, written by senior reporter Mick Clifford.

The subject of the articles was a report compiled by consultancy firm EY, following an investigation into allegations made against Purcell by another IPI employee.

Orla Purcell, of Ballsbridge, Dublin 4, had claimed that various statements in the articles were defamatory in meaning, and were “false, unbalanced and published maliciously knowing that they were untrue or being reckless as to their truth”.

The Irish Examiner had denied these claims. It said the articles had a different meaning to that contended by Purcell, and that its pleaded meaning was true.

The newspaper also relied on a defence of fair and reasonable publication on a matter of public interest.

On Tuesday, barrister Hugh McDowell, appearing for Purcell, told Judge Tony O’Connor that the case had been resolved.

He said both sides were seeking a one-week adjournment of the case to finalise matters.

The judge granted the adjournment.

More in this section

Laois Nationalist
Newsletter

Get Laois news delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up