Consequences of alleged abuse by Jeffrey Donaldson ‘cannot be ignored’

By Jonathan McCambridge, Press Association

The consequences of alleged sexual abuse by Jeffrey Donaldson “cannot be ignored and brushed under the carpet any longer”, a court has heard.

A barrister said there was “no reason” why two women who claim they were sexually abused by the ex-MP when they were children would lie.

Making her closing speech in the sexual offences trial of the former DUP leader, prosecution barrister Rosemary Walsh said the two women have “put their heads above the parapet and braced for what was coming at them”.

She said the alleged victims were not “promoting a pack of malicious lies for absolutely no good reason”.

Donaldson, 63, has pleaded not guilty to 18 alleged offences.

The charges include one count of rape and allegations of indecent assault and gross indecency, and span a period between 1985 and 2008 involving two alleged victims.

Complainants A and B have both given evidence at the trial.

Both women allege they were abused as children.

Jeffrey Donaldson spent two days in the witness box giving evidence in the trial last week.

Eleanor Donaldson, 60, from Dublinhill Road, Dromore, Co Down, denies several charges of aiding and abetting her husband’s alleged offending.

She is facing a trial of the facts on mental health grounds.

The trial of the facts will test the evidence in the case but cannot result in a criminal conviction.

On Tuesday, Walsh said she had asked Donaldson when he was being cross-examined on several occasions why the two women would make up the claims.

She said: “The reality is this, there is no reason why these women would lie in this way.”

She added: “What the evidence shows when it is pieced together is that they are telling the truth about what happened to them.

“That is why they have given evidence to this court.

“Not because they are promoting a pack of malicious lies for absolutely no good reason, but because this is what happened and they have made a decision to call it out.

“They have put their heads above the parapet and braced for what was coming at them.”

Walsh said: “The consequences of Mr Donaldson’s actions, and to a much lesser extent his wife’s, are why we are all here today.

“Not because these two women have fabricated their accounts or because they are conjuring up lies to tell.

“But because the sexual abuse they suffered has consequences – consequences that cannot be ignored and brushed under the carpet any longer.”

“That is why Mr Donaldson is and should be found guilty of the offences on this indictment.”

Earlier, Walsh said it was human nature for people to sometimes “lock away” thoughts.

The barrister said Complainant A had spent years “shelving and avoiding dealing” with alleged abuse, while Complainant B “kept those memories locked away inside”.

But she said there had been “turning points” for both women which made them come forward and report the alleged abuse to police.

She said: “Issues which had been shelved and locked away surfaced, demanding to be seen and demanding to be dealt with.”

Turning to the issue of why A had not reported the alleged abuse before 2024, Walsh said: “This is a woman who has really, properly considered whether she should put her head above the parapet.

“She knew this would not just be a normal case.

“It was a huge, huge decision to make and not one she made lightly.”

She said Complainant B had “blamed herself” for the alleged abuse.

Walsh said both women had gone to police in 2024.

She said: “Yes, two voices are better than one… this process is difficult.”

She said it had been a “long and arduous process” which had culminated in several hours of questioning in court.

The barrister said: “Their pain and hurt is still so visible.”

She added: “This is not something they are doing for the fun of it.”

Walsh said: “Today, you see two women at a time when they are ready for this… they have not always been that way.”

The barrister said neither woman has a “full or complete recollection” of the alleged abuse, stating some memories are “fragmentary”.

But she told the jury that is the way memory of childhood events can work.

She said both alleged victims remember “distinctive incidents”.

The barrister referred to a meeting Complainant B had with Donaldson while staying at a Christian centre in Armoy in Co Antrim in the 1990s.

Walsh said it was clear “reconciliation at that stage was the purpose of the meeting”.

She said: “No-one asked this girl exactly what the abuse was she had referred to.

“The topic remained untouched, the hornet’s nest avoided.”

Referring to an incident in which Complainant A alleges Donaldson had used a light to look at her genitals, the barrister said Eleanor Donaldson had been told but that the incident was “brushed under the carpet”.

She said years later, Complainant A had told her husband about the alleged abuse to give him the “option of walking away” from the relationship if he chose to.

She said: “It underlines this is not something that has been fabricated on a whim.”

Walsh told the jury they had watched police interviews with both of the alleged victims.

She said: “You are the people that have to assess if you are sure that they are telling the truth.”

Referring to an incident where Complainant B alleges she was raped by Donaldson, Walsh said: “She recalls the breathing, laboured and panting and the hope he would stop and lose interest.”

Recounting an alleged incident where B claimed Donaldson lifted her top and played with her breasts, she said: “In the dark, he treats her like the object she is to him.”

Returning to the meeting at the Co Antrim Christian Centre between Complainant B and Donaldson in the 1990s, Walsh said it was “clear there was very little discussion and very little conversation”.

She said: “This meeting had the potential to be explosive because everyone, including Mr Donaldson, knew it concerned a serious allegation.”

She added: “We say Jeffrey Donaldson shut that meeting down, he knew this was a problem that needed to be dealt with, he took control of that meeting.”

She said Donaldson “knew what the meeting was about and stopped questions”.

Walsh said: “He was there to manage a problem and he did that very well indeed.”

The barrister said Donaldson had shown from his account of the meeting he was “willing to lie”.

Referring again to the light incident involving Complainant A, Walsh said the alleged victim was “certain she knew he was looking at her private parts with a light”.

She said Donaldson had been “caught in the act”, adding “he knew he had no explanation”.

The barrister then turned to a letter written by Donaldson to Complainant A in 2020 where he referred to “being in a deep pit of sin” and of causing “deep wounds”.

Walsh said it was a matter for the jury to decide whether the letter “refers to the hurt” of A.

She added that the prosecution say the reference to “deep wounds” in the letter is “highly significant”.

Turning to the alleged offending of Eleanor Donaldson, Walsh said she was “fully aware of the risk Donaldson posed” but “did not intervene but rather facilitated the abuse”.

The case continues.